SOLUTION COMPARISON

选择适合组织风险与工作方式的方案

云桌面、远程控制、DLP、磁盘加密和 SWZ 关注的核心问题不同。以下比较只描述常见方案类型,不针对任何具体品牌或单一产品。

对比结果是对常见方案形态的概括。具体产品能力、部署方式与使用体验会因版本和配置而异,应以实际评估为准。
CAPABILITY MATRIX

从十二项关键维度理解差异

重点关注设备失控后数据是否仍受保护,以及多终端可见性、远程协作和处置审计是否真正形成联动。

Comparison dimensionSWZ Terminal Security and Remote ManagementTraditional cloud desktop/VDINormal remote controlDLP / Endpoint SecuritySingle disk encryption
Main work computing powerTerminal nativeData center or cloud hostingTerminal nativeTerminal nativeTerminal native
Local usage experienceClose to native working environmentAffected by network and host resourcesNative systemNative systemNative system
Dual-environment isolationNative integrationUsually not involvedUsually not availableUsually not availableUsually not available
Device out-of-control data protectionCore capabilitiesUsually relies on data failure and access controlUsually not a core competencyDepends on product capabilitiesOne of the core competencies
Global multi-terminal managementFull integrationusually hasPartial connection managementusually hasUsually not available
Screen wall and carouselNative integrationPlatform or extension dependentSome products haveUsually not a core competencyNot available
Desktop recording and auditingNative integrationPlatform or extension dependentSome products haveusually focuses on behavioral auditsNot available
File and camera managementUnified permissions and auditingDepends on platform capabilitiesSome products haveDepends on product capabilitiesNot available
Batch locking and data processingNative integrationMainly disable sessions or accountsSome products haveDepends on product capabilitiesOften relies on manual labor
Administrator decentralization and auditingNative integrationusually hasLarge differences in abilitiesusually hasUsually weaker
Offline/LAN deploymentSupportThe architecture cost is high or depends on the platformDepends on productDepends on productSupport
SaaS / Private / Hybrid DeploymentAll supportedDepends on planDepends on productDepends on productNot applicable
WHAT CHANGES

SWZ 与常见方案类型的侧重点

01

Compared to Cloud Desktop/VDI

SWZ keeps the main workload on the terminal itself, reducing reliance on centralized host computing power and continuous network quality, while combining dual environments, device failure protection, remote control and audit processing on the same platform.

02

Compared with ordinary remote control

Ordinary remote control focuses more on connection and assistance; SWZ, in addition to remote desktop, further covers dual-environment isolation, screen walls, video recording, file and camera management, batch lock control, and administrator auditing.

03

Compared to DLP/Endpoint Security

DLP often centers on behavior detection, outgoing control and auditing; SWZ emphasizes protected working environments, data protection after equipment goes out of control, and the integration of global remote management and emergency response.

04

Compared to single disk encryption

Single encryption usually focuses on static data protection; SWZ also provides dual environments, multi-terminal visibility, remote collaboration, permission approval, desktop recording and event handling capabilities.

DECISION GUIDE

什么时候更适合评估 SWZ?

如果您的目标不仅是远程连接或单点防护,而是同时解决工作环境隔离、设备失控、多终端管理和事件处置,可以进一步评估。

希望使用终端本机性能,减少集中宿主资源瓶颈
需要在设备被带离或存储硬件脱离后继续保护数据
需要在一个平台查看、协助和处置大量工作电脑
需要屏幕查看、录像、文件和处置操作全部受权限审计
需要私有化、离线局域网或混合部署
START WITH CONTROL

用真实场景验证方案是否合适

我们可以根据设备规模、网络架构和安全目标,安排针对性的产品演示与方案讨论。